Kling 3.0 Pro vs Wan 2.7

Two AI video models, one credit balance. Here is how they differ on price, length, quality and sound. Every number is what Cirrela charges today.

Side by side

FeatureKling 3.0 ProWan 2.7
Made byKuaishouAlibaba
Good atDynamic motion, multi-shot storytelling, native audioCoherent multi-shot sequences in crisp 1080p, with music
Price for a default video84 credits, 5 seconds at 1080p with sound75 credits, 5 seconds at 1080p with sound
Length5 to 15 seconds5 to 15 seconds
SoundMade with the videoMade with the video
Best resolution1080p (paid plans)1080p (720p on the free plan)
Start from a photoYesYes
Formats16:9, 9:16, 1:116:9, 9:16, 1:1, 4:3, 3:4

Run the same idea through both

Pick a prompt, make it with each model and keep the one you like. The pictures are stock clips that show the idea, not output from either model.

Example

Close-up of a woman with glowing circuits on her face, slow drift, sci-fi atmosphere

Example

Fast FPV drone over a palm-lined beach at golden hour, waves rolling in, warm haze, anamorphic flare

Example

Silhouette facing an infinite tunnel of square neon light, slow push-in, volumetric haze

Example

Elegant woman in a silk kimono, colored neon light falling across her face, slow motion

Which one should you pick?

Pick Kling 3.0 Pro if

  • its strength fits your idea: dynamic motion, multi-shot storytelling, native audio.
Try Kling 3.0 Pro

Pick Wan 2.7 if

  • you want the lower price: 75 credits against 84 for a default video.
Try Wan 2.7

Not sure? Make the same idea with both. New accounts get 60 free credits, failed renders are refunded, and the Create button shows the exact price before you click.