Seedance 2.5 vs Wan 2.7
Two AI video models, one credit balance. Here is how they differ on price, length, quality and sound. Every number is what Cirrela charges today.
Side by side
| Feature | Seedance 2.5 | Wan 2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Made by | ByteDance | Alibaba |
| Good at | Long cinematic takes up to 30s with native synced audio | Coherent multi-shot sequences in crisp 1080p, with music |
| Price for a default video | 237 credits, 5 seconds at 720p with sound | 75 credits, 5 seconds at 1080p with sound |
| Length | 5 to 30 seconds | 5 to 15 seconds |
| Sound | Made with the video | Made with the video |
| Best resolution | 1080p (720p on the free plan) | 1080p (720p on the free plan) |
| Start from a photo | Yes, but not of real people | Yes |
| Formats | 16:9, 9:16, 1:1, 4:3, 3:4, 21:9 | 16:9, 9:16, 1:1, 4:3, 3:4 |
Run the same idea through both
Pick a prompt, make it with each model and keep the one you like. The pictures are stock clips that show the idea, not output from either model.
Aerial over a calm sea at sunset, golden clouds, slow cinematic glide
Car driving along the seashore at sunset, tracking shot from a chase vehicle
Close-up of a woman with glowing circuits on her face, slow drift, sci-fi atmosphere
Fast FPV drone over a palm-lined beach at golden hour, waves rolling in, warm haze, anamorphic flare
Which one should you pick?
Pick Wan 2.7 if
- you want the lower price: 75 credits against 237 for a default video.
- you want to animate photos of real people, which it accepts.
Not sure? Make the same idea with both. New accounts get 60 free credits, failed renders are refunded, and the Create button shows the exact price before you click.