Wan 3.0 vs Seedance 2.0 Fast
Two AI video models, one credit balance. Here is how they differ on price, length, quality and sound. Every number is what Cirrela charges today.
Side by side
| Feature | Wan 3.0 | Seedance 2.0 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Made by | Alibaba | ByteDance |
| Good at | Rich, realistic 1080p video up to 30 seconds, with sound | Snappy drafts with audio — iterate in seconds |
| Price for a default video | 100 credits, 5 seconds at 1080p with sound | 121 credits, 5 seconds at 720p with sound |
| Length | 5 to 30 seconds | 4 to 15 seconds |
| Sound | Made with the video | Made with the video |
| Best resolution | 1080p (720p on the free plan) | 720p |
| Start from a photo | Yes | Yes, but not of real people |
| Formats | 16:9, 9:16, 1:1, 4:3, 3:4 | 16:9, 9:16, 1:1, 4:3, 3:4, 21:9 |
Run the same idea through both
Pick a prompt, make it with each model and keep the one you like. The pictures are stock clips that show the idea, not output from either model.
Silhouette facing an infinite tunnel of square neon light, slow push-in, volumetric haze
Elegant woman in a silk kimono, colored neon light falling across her face, slow motion
Dancer in a fluorescent mask moving to a strobing blue light, high-energy music video
Turquoise bay with motorboats, mountains behind, sunset from a high vantage point
Which one should you pick?
Pick Wan 3.0 if
- you want the lower price: 100 credits against 121 for a default video.
- you need longer shots, up to 30 seconds.
- you need higher resolution, up to 1080p.
- you want to animate photos of real people, which it accepts.
Pick Seedance 2.0 Fast if
- its strength fits your idea: snappy drafts with audio — iterate in seconds.
Not sure? Make the same idea with both. New accounts get 60 free credits, failed renders are refunded, and the Create button shows the exact price before you click.