Skip to content

Kling 4.0 Flash vs Wan 2.7

Two AI video models, one credit balance. Here is how they differ on price, length, resolution and sound. Every number is what Cirrela charges today.

Side by side

FeatureKling 4.0 FlashWan 2.7
Made byKuaishouAlibaba
Good atCosts 40% less than Kling 4.0 and, unlike it, makes soundCoherent multi-shot sequences in crisp 1080p, with music
Price for a default video47 credits, 5 seconds at 720p with sound75 credits, 5 seconds at 1080p with sound
Length5 to 20 seconds5 to 15 seconds
SoundMade with the videoMade with the video
Best resolution720p1080p (paid plans)
Start from a photoYesYes
Formats16:9, 9:16, 1:1, 21:916:9, 9:16, 1:1, 4:3, 3:4

Run the same idea through both

Pick a prompt, make it with each model and keep the one you like. The clips were made with Cirrela to show the idea, not necessarily with these two models.

Example

A woman in dark sunglasses drives a vintage convertible through a city at night, neon reflections sliding across the windshield, light rain, cinematic 35mm film look, soft engine sound

Example

Top-down drone shot of surfers riding turquoise waves at sunset, long shadows on the water, crisp detail, slow steady glide, ocean sound

Example

Anime opening sequence: a girl with a long red scarf sprints across a rooftop at sunset, cherry blossom petals swirling around her, dynamic camera sweep, hand-drawn cel shading, energetic rock music

Example

Turquoise bay with small motorboats, mountains behind, sunset from a high vantage point, slow steady glide, gentle wind and water sound

Which one should you pick?

Pick Kling 4.0 Flash if

  • you want the lower price: 47 credits against 75 for a default video.
  • you need longer shots, up to 20 seconds.
Try Kling 4.0 Flash

Pick Wan 2.7 if

  • you need higher resolution, up to 1080p.
Try Wan 2.7

Not sure? Make the same idea with both. Failed renders are refunded, and the Create button shows the exact price before you click.