Seedance 2.0 Fast vs Wan 2.7
Two AI video models, one credit balance. Here is how they differ on price, length, quality and sound. Every number is what Cirrela charges today.
Side by side
| Feature | Seedance 2.0 Fast | Wan 2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Made by | ByteDance | Alibaba |
| Good at | Snappy drafts with audio — iterate in seconds | Coherent multi-shot sequences in crisp 1080p, with music |
| Price for a default video | 121 credits, 5 seconds at 720p with sound | 75 credits, 5 seconds at 1080p with sound |
| Length | 4 to 15 seconds | 5 to 15 seconds |
| Sound | Made with the video | Made with the video |
| Best resolution | 720p | 1080p (720p on the free plan) |
| Start from a photo | Yes, but not of real people | Yes |
| Formats | 16:9, 9:16, 1:1, 4:3, 3:4, 21:9 | 16:9, 9:16, 1:1, 4:3, 3:4 |
Run the same idea through both
Pick a prompt, make it with each model and keep the one you like. The pictures are stock clips that show the idea, not output from either model.
Elegant woman in a silk kimono, colored neon light falling across her face, slow motion
Dancer in a fluorescent mask moving to a strobing blue light, high-energy music video
Turquoise bay with motorboats, mountains behind, sunset from a high vantage point
Extreme close-up, cyberpunk makeup glowing under magenta and cyan neon, slow vertical pan, shallow depth of field
Which one should you pick?
Pick Seedance 2.0 Fast if
- its strength fits your idea: snappy drafts with audio — iterate in seconds.
Pick Wan 2.7 if
- you want the lower price: 75 credits against 121 for a default video.
- you need higher resolution, up to 1080p.
- you want to animate photos of real people, which it accepts.
Not sure? Make the same idea with both. New accounts get 60 free credits, failed renders are refunded, and the Create button shows the exact price before you click.