Skip to content

Kling 4.0 Flash vs Wan 3.0

Two AI video models, one credit balance. Here is how they differ on price, length, resolution and sound. Every number is what Cirrela charges today.

Side by side

FeatureKling 4.0 FlashWan 3.0
Made byKuaishouAlibaba
Good atCosts 40% less than Kling 4.0 and, unlike it, makes soundRich, realistic 1080p video up to 30 seconds, with sound
Price for a default video47 credits, 5 seconds at 720p with sound100 credits, 5 seconds at 1080p with sound
Length5 to 20 seconds5 to 30 seconds
SoundMade with the videoMade with the video
Best resolution720p1080p (paid plans)
Start from a photoYesYes
Formats16:9, 9:16, 1:1, 21:916:9, 9:16, 1:1, 4:3, 3:4

Run the same idea through both

Pick a prompt, make it with each model and keep the one you like. The clips were made with Cirrela to show the idea, not necessarily with these two models.

Example

Anime opening sequence: a girl with a long red scarf sprints across a rooftop at sunset, cherry blossom petals swirling around her, dynamic camera sweep, hand-drawn cel shading, energetic rock music

Example

Turquoise bay with small motorboats, mountains behind, sunset from a high vantage point, slow steady glide, gentle wind and water sound

Example

Macro shot of molten dark chocolate pouring slowly over a fresh raspberry tart on a marble counter, glossy detail, soft window light, slow motion, high-end food commercial, gentle pouring sound

Example

A woman in dark sunglasses drives a vintage convertible through a city at night, neon reflections sliding across the windshield, light rain, cinematic 35mm film look, soft engine sound

Which one should you pick?

Pick Kling 4.0 Flash if

  • you want the lower price: 47 credits against 100 for a default video.
Try Kling 4.0 Flash

Pick Wan 3.0 if

  • you need longer shots, up to 30 seconds.
  • you need higher resolution, up to 1080p.
Try Wan 3.0

Not sure? Make the same idea with both. Failed renders are refunded, and the Create button shows the exact price before you click.