Wan 3.0 vs Kling 4.0
Two AI video models, one credit balance. Here is how they differ on price, length, quality and sound. Every number is what Cirrela charges today.
Side by side
| Feature | Wan 3.0 | Kling 4.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Made by | Alibaba | Kuaishou |
| Good at | Rich, realistic 1080p video up to 30 seconds, with sound | Kling's newest model: steady fast motion, up to 30 seconds |
| Price for a default video | 100 credits, 5 seconds at 1080p with sound | 118 credits, 5 seconds at 1080p |
| Length | 5 to 30 seconds | 5 to 30 seconds |
| Sound | Made with the video | No sound |
| Best resolution | 1080p (paid plans) | 1080p (paid plans) |
| Start from a photo | Yes | Yes |
| Formats | 16:9, 9:16, 1:1, 4:3, 3:4 | 16:9, 9:16, 1:1, 21:9 |
Run the same idea through both
Pick a prompt, make it with each model and keep the one you like. The pictures are stock clips that show the idea, not output from either model.
Fast FPV drone over a palm-lined beach at golden hour, waves rolling in, warm haze, anamorphic flare
Silhouette facing an infinite tunnel of square neon light, slow push-in, volumetric haze
Elegant woman in a silk kimono, colored neon light falling across her face, slow motion
Dancer in a fluorescent mask moving to a strobing blue light, high-energy music video
Which one should you pick?
Pick Wan 3.0 if
- you want the lower price: 100 credits against 118 for a default video.
- you want sound made with the picture.
Pick Kling 4.0 if
- its strength fits your idea: kling's newest model: steady fast motion, up to 30 seconds.
Not sure? Make the same idea with both. New accounts get 60 free credits, failed renders are refunded, and the Create button shows the exact price before you click.